<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Judy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/</link>
	<description>A sanctuary for young free-thinkers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:54:00 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kingsford Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5994</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kingsford Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5994</guid>
		<description>Good luck with preventing randy teenagers from fornicating because they don&#039;t have a license!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with preventing randy teenagers from fornicating because they don’t have a license!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chumley</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5992</link>
		<dc:creator>Chumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5992</guid>
		<description>Sorry I haven&#039;t been around to comment. I posted this just before I went in to surgery on my &quot;extreem lower back&quot; :-) and this is the second time I have actually been able to sit down.

stanzi you bring up a very good point that I hadn&#039;t thought about. I think I was wrong in saying &quot;Leave the science to the scientists and the parenting to the parents.&quot;
There are plenty of scientists that subscribe to psudo-science so it only makes sense that there would be parents who subscribe to bad parenting.

I think the main point I was trying to put forward is that just because you don&#039;t agree with a punishment doesn&#039;t make it wrong.
I think I should restate my main point as;
wait for adequate evidence before you call child services.

The call you recieved is bad news but i&#039;m glad you were able to logically disprove the allegations.
I think a &quot;parent licence&quot; would be a great idea. I&#039;m not a parent yet, but I would go through a test to prove my capability. When you have a child you hold someone&#039;s life in your hands, just like driving a car, so I think it would be a good idea to show that you can be responsible.
Also parenting classes are another resource for parenting knowledge. Making at least a few sessions mandatory would be a good basis for your parenting knowledge. I know when I have a child i&#039;m going to be looking everywhere for information and advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I haven’t been around to comment. I posted this just before I went in to surgery on my “extreem lower back” :-) and this is the second time I have actually been able to sit down.</p>
<p>stanzi you bring up a very good point that I hadn’t thought about. I think I was wrong in saying “Leave the science to the scientists and the parenting to the parents.“<br />
There are plenty of scientists that subscribe to psudo-science so it only makes sense that there would be parents who subscribe to bad parenting.</p>
<p>I think the main point I was trying to put forward is that just because you don’t agree with a punishment doesn’t make it wrong.<br />
I think I should restate my main point as;<br />
wait for adequate evidence before you call child services.</p>
<p>The call you recieved is bad news but i’m glad you were able to logically disprove the allegations.<br />
I think a “parent licence” would be a great idea. I’m not a parent yet, but I would go through a test to prove my capability. When you have a child you hold someone’s life in your hands, just like driving a car, so I think it would be a good idea to show that you can be responsible.<br />
Also parenting classes are another resource for parenting knowledge. Making at least a few sessions mandatory would be a good basis for your parenting knowledge. I know when I have a child i’m going to be looking everywhere for information and advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5987</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5987</guid>
		<description>There are some great programs out there for teaching critical thinking. Its not about rote learning, they do a lot of student involvement and use lots of real world examples and practicing. 

Sorry to hear about your stressful call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some great programs out there for teaching critical thinking. Its not about rote learning, they do a lot of student involvement and use lots of real world examples and practicing. </p>
<p>Sorry to hear about your stressful call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stanzi</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5964</link>
		<dc:creator>stanzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5964</guid>
		<description>Critical thinking in high schools. That would be the way to go... although... I&#039;m sure teachers would find a way to teach it so that it amounted to nothing more than memorizing stuff from books.

oh.. by the way. Someone called child services about ME this week... I got a phone call from Child Protection Services who had to ask me about a few claims that someone had made (they remained anonymous, but I knew exactly which lunatic had made the allegations). The phone call ended with him saying &quot;Your answers have all been very logical&quot; and the issue was dropped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critical thinking in high schools. That would be the way to go… although… I’m sure teachers would find a way to teach it so that it amounted to nothing more than memorizing stuff from books.</p>
<p>oh.. by the way. Someone called child services about ME this week… I got a phone call from Child Protection Services who had to ask me about a few claims that someone had made (they remained anonymous, but I knew exactly which lunatic had made the allegations). The phone call ended with him saying “Your answers have all been very logical” and the issue was dropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5958</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5958</guid>
		<description>As a new parent myself i recognised early on the importance of sourcing advice from many sources. Parents with the same aged child, parents of older children, grandparents, books on child psychology and development. I also discuss personal experiences with my wife to determine what lessons we can learn from our parents methods. We also respect an element of instinct. Observing other parental methods is useful and self assessing our own methods regularly is important. Frankly its very pseudo scientific, we have no training as such but we try to apply critical thinking to our daily life. 

I think rather than a license, training or such on top of what services there currently are. I would much prefer to see a critical thinking class be added to high school education. This has unlimited applications to that persons future actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a new parent myself i recognised early on the importance of sourcing advice from many sources. Parents with the same aged child, parents of older children, grandparents, books on child psychology and development. I also discuss personal experiences with my wife to determine what lessons we can learn from our parents methods. We also respect an element of instinct. Observing other parental methods is useful and self assessing our own methods regularly is important. Frankly its very pseudo scientific, we have no training as such but we try to apply critical thinking to our daily life. </p>
<p>I think rather than a license, training or such on top of what services there currently are. I would much prefer to see a critical thinking class be added to high school education. This has unlimited applications to that persons future actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefly</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>btw Stanzi

&#039;&#039;Since when did parents go through 4-7 years of training to be a parent?A real parent doesn’t necessarily know what’s best for a child any better than a non-parent, and in many cases a non-parent may know better. ( I’ve often thought that prospective parents should go through training before they’re allowed to have a kid.)&#039;&#039;

OMG... I completely agree with you i just never thought i would ever hear that from an adult let alone a mother! My family is rather traditionally Italian, so no matter what you do if you&#039;re younger you&#039;re automatically more stupid, less wise and your opinions less valuable. Training you say? I have often suggested a parent license, is that too much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw Stanzi</p>
<p>”Since when did parents go through 4–7 years of training to be a parent?A real parent doesn’t necessarily know what’s best for a child any better than a non-parent, and in many cases a non-parent may know better. ( I’ve often thought that prospective parents should go through training before they’re allowed to have a kid.)”</p>
<p>OMG… I completely agree with you i just never thought i would ever hear that from an adult let alone a mother! My family is rather traditionally Italian, so no matter what you do if you’re younger you’re automatically more stupid, less wise and your opinions less valuable. Training you say? I have often suggested a parent license, is that too much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefly</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>@Stanzi 

I think the argument from incredulity Chumley is trying to get at is; she can&#039;t understand that punishing a child is acceptable (or that would be her personal belief/conviction) so therefore it isn&#039;t...

Normally this argument is applied to a premise being unlikely and can therefore be assumed to be false, i.e. i cannot explain or understand how evolution by natural selection could develop life into such complexity therefore evolution of the species could not have occurred. 

Keeping in mind this type of argument is normally coupled with an argument from ignorance, and hence often added in is this idea that, if i don&#039;t understand how evolution could be responsible for the complex species around me, but i can understand (even though completely unproven) how God could be responsible, then God must have done it. If that makes any sense? haha it&#039;s 7 am! :p

Logical fallacies are so important in argumentation if only to make sure your own argument is as logically stable as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stanzi </p>
<p>I think the argument from incredulity Chumley is trying to get at is; she can’t understand that punishing a child is acceptable (or that would be her personal belief/conviction) so therefore it isn’t…</p>
<p>Normally this argument is applied to a premise being unlikely and can therefore be assumed to be false, i.e. i cannot explain or understand how evolution by natural selection could develop life into such complexity therefore evolution of the species could not have occurred. </p>
<p>Keeping in mind this type of argument is normally coupled with an argument from ignorance, and hence often added in is this idea that, if i don’t understand how evolution could be responsible for the complex species around me, but i can understand (even though completely unproven) how God could be responsible, then God must have done it. If that makes any sense? haha it’s 7 am! :p</p>
<p>Logical fallacies are so important in argumentation if only to make sure your own argument is as logically stable as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stanzi</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>stanzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>Good stuff.  

However... who was making an argument from personal incredulity?  If you mean the woman who was calling child services, how so?

And &quot;Leave the science to the scientists and the parenting to the parents&quot;?!!  

Since when did parents go through 4-7 years of training to be a parent?A real parent doesn&#039;t necessarily know what&#039;s best for a child any better than a non-parent, and in many cases a non-parent may know better. ( I&#039;ve often thought that prospective parents should go through training before they&#039;re allowed to have a kid.)

This deserves its own post, but here is an example of a person who probably does &quot;know better&quot; than real mothers:

http://www.essentialbaby.com.au/parenting/baby/no-more-tears-20090629-d1u5.html?s_rid=rainbow%3Ahp5%3Ano-more-tears%3Aeb%3Ababy%3A30jun09

(ps. I&#039;m a mum)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff.  </p>
<p>However… who was making an argument from personal incredulity?  If you mean the woman who was calling child services, how so?</p>
<p>And “Leave the science to the scientists and the parenting to the parents”?!!  </p>
<p>Since when did parents go through 4–7 years of training to be a parent?A real parent doesn’t necessarily know what’s best for a child any better than a non-parent, and in many cases a non-parent may know better. ( I’ve often thought that prospective parents should go through training before they’re allowed to have a kid.)</p>
<p>This deserves its own post, but here is an example of a person who probably does “know better” than real mothers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.essentialbaby.com.au/parenting/baby/no-more-tears-20090629-d1u5.html?s_rid=rainbow%3Ahp5%3Ano-more-tears%3Aeb%3Ababy%3A30jun09" rel="nofollow">http://www.essentialbaby.com.au/parenting/baby/no-more-tears-20090629-d1u5.html?s_rid=rainbow%3Ahp5%3Ano-more-tears%3Aeb%3Ababy%3A30jun09</a></p>
<p>(ps. I’m a mum)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefly</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/judge-judy/comment-page-1/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2743#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>Honing the logical fallacies while you&#039;re incapacitated i see! You know something dude, i never realised Judge Judy was being incredibly logical until you pointed it out. I used to think the same way about her but you&#039;re right, she&#039;s doing the world a favour by bashing on illogical approaches to situations.

Nice post, keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honing the logical fallacies while you’re incapacitated i see! You know something dude, i never realised Judge Judy was being incredibly logical until you pointed it out. I used to think the same way about her but you’re right, she’s doing the world a favour by bashing on illogical approaches to situations.</p>
<p>Nice post, keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
