<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Philosophical Naturalism, and why do I accept it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/what-is-philosophical-naturalism-and-why-do-i-accept-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/what-is-philosophical-naturalism-and-why-do-i-accept-it/</link>
	<description>A sanctuary for young free-thinkers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:47:56 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/06/what-is-philosophical-naturalism-and-why-do-i-accept-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=2703#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>One of the troubles with those definitions is... imagine a subatomic particle (&quot;thoughtexcersizon&quot;) which does not interact with any other type of particle (including those that we are made and make things out of), except, of course, for antithoughtexcersizons, and I&#039;m not sure about whether it would interact with sthoughtexcersizons. Would that be a supernatural subatomic particle? Utterly undetectable, and without any application (obviously), but it still seems a bit weird to describe it as &quot;supernatural&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the troubles with those definitions is… imagine a subatomic particle (“thoughtexcersizon”) which does not interact with any other type of particle (including those that we are made and make things out of), except, of course, for antithoughtexcersizons, and I’m not sure about whether it would interact with sthoughtexcersizons. Would that be a supernatural subatomic particle? Utterly undetectable, and without any application (obviously), but it still seems a bit weird to describe it as “supernatural”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
