<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The state of science reporting…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/08/the-state-of-science-reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/08/the-state-of-science-reporting/</link>
	<description>A sanctuary for young free-thinkers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bannan</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/08/the-state-of-science-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-7555</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bannan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=3903#comment-7555</guid>
		<description>Heh heh - very good :-)

Now riddle me this...Catalyst - good or cringe-worthy?  I watch it because it&#039;s one of the few mainstream outlets to find out about what&#039;s happening in the Australian scientific community, but sometimes I feel that they&#039;re REALLY dumbing it down.  Also while I will be the first to stand up and say that Maryanne Demasi is both highly qualified and attractive, I fail to see how a story about someone else&#039;s scientific achievements is intellectually enhanced by a close-up of her cleavage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh heh — very good :-)</p>
<p>Now riddle me this…Catalyst — good or cringe-worthy?  I watch it because it’s one of the few mainstream outlets to find out about what’s happening in the Australian scientific community, but sometimes I feel that they’re REALLY dumbing it down.  Also while I will be the first to stand up and say that Maryanne Demasi is both highly qualified and attractive, I fail to see how a story about someone else’s scientific achievements is intellectually enhanced by a close-up of her cleavage…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
