<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Young Australian Skeptics &#187; Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youngausskeptics.com/tag/debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com</link>
	<description>A sanctuary for young free-thinkers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Why Dawkins won’t debate creationists</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/10/why-dawkins-wont-debate-creationists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/10/why-dawkins-wont-debate-creationists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Ball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheist Foundation of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Henaan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=4867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeing that the Atheist Foundation of Australia and Professor Richard Dawkins himself will understandably see no merit in responding to this self-promoting nobody, I thought I would respond publicly on their behalf. To begin, let me quote a few excerpts from an article published this morning on Christianity Today titled Australian challenges Dawkins, the Goliath [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/10/why-dawkins-wont-debate-creationists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>References preferred when overturning modern biology</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/10/references-preferred-when-overturning-modern-biology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/10/references-preferred-when-overturning-modern-biology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Scanlan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Scanlan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=4607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The chance to have email debates with creationists is one of the reasons I write for the Young Australian Skeptics and have my own blog — I’m a debate junkie, actually. Nothing’s better than sinking your teeth into a few new arguments that you’ve never heard of, or at least taking the time to explain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/10/references-preferred-when-overturning-modern-biology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Nice Boy — Pity About The Response” — A Riposte</title>
		<link>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2008/12/nice-boy-pity-about-the-response-a-riposte/</link>
		<comments>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2008/12/nice-boy-pity-about-the-response-a-riposte/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kylie Sturgess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kylie Sturgess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Skeptic Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skeptical women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youngausskeptics.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a few things that I sometimes feel I should blog about — in order to question and challenge ‘assumptions of what is good and what is bad’. I say that because once you start setting down metaphorical ‘black and white’ divides — you best know where the ‘grey’ comes into it. Things that concern [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2008/12/nice-boy-pity-about-the-response-a-riposte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
